Industry Experts Explain 3 Methods to Reduce Hospital Readmission (Part 2)

Last week, we began investigating various flaws that leading health experts have found in the recent CMS rules punishing hospitals with high readmission rates. So far, we’ve covered an oversight by CMS that is ignoring the possibility of readmission caused by the patient’s social environment. We’ve also looked at mistakes hospitals could be making by releasing surgery patients too quickly.

Today, we’re examining a suggestion brought to us by FierceHealthcare editor Karen Cheung-Larivee. As usual in these cases, the answer to patient readmission may lie in technology.

A pilot program at Central Indiana Beacon Community that focuses on remote video conferencing between nurses and discharged hospital patients cut readmissions by a dramatic 75 percent, according to Alan Snell (pictured), chief medical informatics officer at Indianapolis-based St. Vincent Health and panel speaker at the upcoming FierceMobileHealthcare breakfast roundtable on Dec. 4 at the mHealth Summit. Seven St. Vincent's hospitals and seven partner hospitals participated in the program with 300 patients who were being discharged with diagnoses of congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

"We went after patients that were in capitated populations our self-insured, employed population for the hospital and their dependents so that we could establish baselines on their cost of care before and during the monitoring," he said. "We're finding some pretty dramatic drops in that cost of care."

From the outside, it seems like this video technology is an affordable solution for an expensive problem. However, many health experts and hospital executives disagree.

Where do you stand on the issue? Leave a comment on this blog with your suggestions, and we’ll be responding in the future with some of your best ideas, criticisms, and questions!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pam Argeris is a thought leader in the Healthcare Industry and possesses extensive, hands-on experience with CMS compliance, and multiple regulatory bodies such as NCQA, JACHO, and DOI. In her role at Merrill Corp., Pam focuses on developing solutions for compliance and quality assurance, delivered in a cost effective manner to improve beneficiary and prospect communications. You can contact Pam at Pamela.Argeris@merrillcorp.com.

Industry Experts Explain 3 Methods to Reduce Hospital Readmission (Part 1)

Fines for high readmission rates have been punishing some of America’s hospitals since October first. Many experts in the industry have been working to find solutions to what has become one of the most prevalent issues faced by health facilities today.

Andrew Seaman, with Reuters, suggests that social factors, outside of the reach of any hospital, may be contributing more than CMS is willing to admit.

But CMS does not consider so-called social factors, such as a patient's living situation or low income, when profiling the quality of a hospital's care.

In the new study, published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, researchers analyzed data from 72 previous papers examining the reasons people died or were readmitted to the hospital, and found that age, race, employment status, living situation, education and income levels are just some of the factors that may play a role.

"We don't yet know how to accurately measure (the factors), but I think we found enough information to say that they are important and that they should continue to be studied and accounted for," said lead author Dr. Linda Calvillo-King, an assistant professor of internal medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas.

In the Reuters article, Calvillo-King explains that too many factors outside of a hospital’s control -- such as whether or not a patient follows prescription instructions -- are leading to readmission penalties.

Alternatively, in a recent NPR report, Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, of the Yale School of Medicine, believes that patients are simply being released too early after surgery.

"We live in an era where there is a pressure to discharge and to expedite care and make health care more efficient," says Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, a surgery professor at the Yale School of Medicine who co-authored the study. "Some of these complications in the past may have occurred while patients were still hospitalized. Now they occur at home."

Sosa and her colleagues analyzed a database of more than 500,000 patients who underwent surgery from 2005 through 2010. The researchers found that the most common surgical complication patients experience after leaving the hospital is a localized infection at the site of the incision…

…More than 40 percent of all patients who experience complications after surgery experience them at home, according to a study in the journal Archives of Surgery. Half of those complications occur within nine days of patients leaving the hospital.

Next week, we’ll continue delving into these topics, and will open the floor to suggestions on how hospitals should be changing to meet CMS guidelines, or if those guidelines are even plausible.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pam Argeris is a thought leader in the Healthcare Industry and possesses extensive, hands-on experience with CMS compliance, and multiple regulatory bodies such as NCQA, JACHO, and DOI. In her role at Merrill Corp., Pam focuses on developing solutions for compliance and quality assurance, delivered in a cost effective manner to improve beneficiary and prospect communications. You can contact Pam at Pamela.Argeris@merrillcorp.com.

Video Analysis: Are Healthcare Costs Out of Control?

We recently discovered the following video on Reason.com. The video details a few facts about healthcare costs that most consumers would probably find surprising.

Of course, the high costs of healthcare are nothing new for those of us in the industry. The question that everyone is clamoring to answer is: why?

Reason.com presents a few examples of gross over-pricing in the video, but none is more black-and-white than that of a “complex bilateral sinus procedure.” The procedure was priced at a major hospital, as well as the Oklahoma Surgery Center. The cost difference ends up at just over $27,000, but the patient would never see that bill, and never think to question the markup. Reason explains:

The Integris bill for the same nasal procedure went to Blue Cross of Oklahoma, so the patient had no compelling reason to question its outrageous markups. They included a $360 charge for a steroid called dexamethasone, which can be purchased wholesale for just 75 cents. Or the three charges totaling $630 for a painkiller called fentanyl citrate, which all together cost the hospital about $1.50.

Integris insists that some prices are raised to cover the cost of pro bono procedures, but Reason’s conclusion is that hospitals are intentionally marking up charges for insurance companies and government agencies to pay, knowing that no one is checking the numbers. It’s a shocking and somewhat believable argument, but is it true? Tell us your opinions in the comments section below!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pam Argeris is a thought leader in the Healthcare Industry and possesses extensive, hands-on experience with CMS compliance, and multiple regulatory bodies such as NCQA, JACHO, and DOI. In her role at Merrill Corp., Pam focuses on developing solutions for compliance and quality assurance, delivered in a cost effective manner to improve beneficiary and prospect communications. You can contact Pam at Pamela.Argeris@merrillcorp.com.